C. Reichhardt, C. J. Olson, and Franco Nori
Department of Physics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Michigan 48109-1120
(Received 29 December 1997)
We present results from an extensive series of simulations and analytical
work on driven vortex lattices interacting with periodic
arrays of pinning sites.
An extremely rich variety of novel dynamical plastic flow phases,
very distinct from those observed in random arrays,
are found as a function of an applied driving force.
Signatures of the transitions between these different dynamical phases
appear as very pronounced
jumps and dips in striking voltage-current V(I) curves that
exhibit hysteresis, reentrant behavior and negative differential
conductivity. By monitoring the moving vortex lattice, we show
that these features coincide with pronounced changes in
the microscopic structure and transport behavior of the
driven lattice.
For the case when the number of vortices is greater than the number of
pinning sites,
the plastic flow regimes
include a one-dimensional (1D) interstitial flow
of vortices between the rows of pinned vortices, a
disordered flow regime where 2D pin-to-pin and winding
interstitial motion of vortices occurs,
and a 1D incommensurate flow regime where vortex motion
is confined along the pinning rows. In the last case, flux-line channels
with an incommensurate number of vortices contain
mobile flux-discommensurations or "flux solitons,"
and commensurate channels remain pinned.
At high driving forces, the 1D incommensurate
paths of moving vortices persist with the entire vortex
lattice flowing. In this regime, the incommensurate channels
move at a higher velocity than the commensurate ones,
causing incommensurate and commensurate rows of moving vortices
to slide past one another.
Thus there is no recrystallization at large driving forces.
Moreover these phases cannot be described by elastic theories.
Different system parameters produce other phases, including
an ordered channel flow regime, where
a small number of vortices are pinned and the rest
of the lattice flows through the
interstitial regions, and
a vacancy flow regime, which occurs
when the number of vortices is less than the number of pinning sites.
We also find a striking reentrant disordered-motion regime in which
the vortex lattice undergoes a series of order-disorder transitions
that display unusual hysteresis properties.
By varying a wide range of values for the microscopic pinning parameters,
including pinning strength, radius, density, and the degree of ordering,
as well as varying the commensurability of the vortex lattice with its
pinning substrate, we obtain
a series of interesting and novel dynamic phase diagrams which
outline the onset of the different dynamical phases.
We show that many of these phases and the phase boundaries
can be well understood in terms of
analytical arguments.
[S0163-1829(98)07934-X]
Many condensed matter systems can be understood in terms of a periodic elastic lattice driven over a disordered rigid substrate. These systems include flux line lattices in superconductors, 1-35 Josephson junctions,36 charge-density waves,37,38 magnetic bubble arrays,39 Wigner crystals,40 and models of friction. 41 Recently, intense interest has focused on the onset of motion, dynamic phases, and topology of lattices as a driving force is increased. For superconducting systems, experimental work in neutron scattering,17, voltage-current V(I) measurements,18-23 and decoration experiments,24,25 as well as theoretical work,5,6,26-32,37 have suggested that, as an external driving force on the lattice is increased, three distinct dynamical phases appear: a pinned or immobile phase, an amorphous plastic flow phase, and at high drives an ordered uniform flow phase. The plastic flow phase begins at the onset of depinning when portions of the lattice break away and become mobile while other portions remain pinned. The flow-paths at this stage are characterized by winding channels or percolationlike paths. 4,6,10,14,33 Due to the breaking and tearing during this phase, the vortex lattice can become very disordered. As the external driving force is further increased, larger portions of the lattice become mobile until, for high driving, the entire lattice enters a uniform flow stage in which the vortex lattice is much more ordered than in the plastic flow or pinned regimes.
These different flow phases have permitted the construction of a dynamic phase diagram as a function of pinning parameters, temperature, and driving force.6,13,27,31,32 Similar results have been obtained for charge-density-wave systems. 37,38 It has been suggested that the onset of ordering at the uniform flow phase is sudden and represents a true phase transition to a moving solid or crystal with long-range order.6 Recently, other studies have suggested that this is not the case and that the driven lattice is instead a highly ordered moving glass.27,28,31,32,37 Transitions in the dynamical behavior of the vortex flow are believed to be directly related to the peak effect18-23 where a transition to plastic flow is marked by a sudden enhancement of the critical current just below Hc2(T), near the vortex melting point.
B. Lattice Driven over a Periodic Substrate
Although dynamical transitions have been examined in superconducting systems where the pinning is random, they have not yet been carefully studied in systems with periodic pinning where very different dynamics are expected due to the symmetry of the underlying pinning and the tunability of the disorder. Periodic pinning occurs in numerous superconducting systems such as wire networks,42,43 Josephson junctions44,45 and layered superconductors.46,47 High-Tc samples contain other forms of periodic pinning such as that produced by the periodic copper-oxide planes.48
Recently, increasing attention has focused on samples with lithographically created well-defined periodic pinning structures such as a lattice of microholes34,49-56 or magnetic dots.57 In such samples the microscopic parameters of the pinning, such as the size, depth, periodicity, and density, can be carefully controlled. Using Lorentz microscopy techniques,34,56 it has been possible to directly image a vortex lattice interacting with periodic arrays of pinning sites, revealing very interesting commensurability effects in the vortex configurations and dynamics.
Extensive work has been done on the interaction of vortices with a periodic "egg-carton" potential as in wire networks and Josephson-junction arrays. However, the dynamics of vortices in such systems differs significantly from the case of vortices in periodic pinning arrays we consider in this work. In our system the radius of the pinning sites can be made much smaller than the period of the pinning lattice, permitting interstitial vortices to appear. The distinctive interstitial vortex motion is not found in superconducting wire networks and Josephson-junction arrays. Periodic pinning arrays may also be of technological importance since the arrays can produce higher critical currents than an equal number of randomly placed pins.10,11 This enhancement of critical currents using periodic arrays has recently been demonstrated for high-Tc systems.55
C. Tunable commensurability
A particularly interesting aspect of periodic pinning arrays
where the pin radius is small compared to the
lattice spacing and where there is only one vortex per pinning site
is that disorder can be fine tuned by changing the commensurability.
At B/
=1, where
is the field at which
the number of vortices equals the number of pinning sites,
the vortex lattice is expected to be locked
into the periodic pinning array.
For B/
> 1,
the vortex lattice can be thought of as containing
two species of vortices: the pinned
vortices that are commensurate with the array of pins, and
the generally more weakly pinned interstitial
vortices that are caged by vortices at the pinning sites.
The very different dynamical behaviors of these two species
has been observed both when the vortices are
current-driven53
and when they
are field-gradient-driven.10,11,51,52
These different dynamics have also been directly observed with
Lorentz microscopy techniques.56
The effect of interstitial vortices at
B/
1, as well as
the commensurate effects at B/
= 1,
are also of major importance
in systems with randomly placed columnar pins, where
theoretical10,58
and experimental59,60
magnetization studies have shown
a substantial drop in the critical current associated with
the appearance of interstitial vortices.
It is also possible to have a well-defined number of vacancies
in the vortex lattice when B/
< 1.
Here, the vortex lattice
can be thought of as containing two species of
vortices, where the second species,
the vacancies, may have different dynamical properties
than the first species, the commensurate vortices.
This situation and terminology is reminiscent of
the case of electrons and "holes" in semiconductors.
D. Nonequilibrium dynamic phase diagram
In order to observe the dynamics of current-driven lattices near commensurability interacting with a periodic array of pinning sites, we have performed a large number of current-driven molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in which we examine experimentally realizable parameters. Our work is distinct from previous current-driven simulations in that we specifically examine the effects of periodic pinning arrays rather than random arrays. Further, our work covers a much larger range of the microscopic pinning and system parameters than used in previous MD simulations, allowing us to construct a variety of detailed dynamical phase diagrams. A much shorter and less detailed account of some the results presented here can be found in Ref. 13.
We find that a vortex lattice driven on a periodic array of pinning sites exhibits far richer and more complex dynamical phase diagrams than the diagrams produced by systems with random pinning arrays. We observe numerous novel plastic flow states and vortex lattice structures distinct from those observed in random pinning arrays. For a certain range of parameters and when the driving force is increased, we find that there is a counterintuitive drop in the number of mobile vortices as the system undergoes a transition from one plastic flow phase to another. This drop in the number of mobile vortices also implies a negative-differential conductivity, a property that is found in several technologically important semiconductor devices.
We find that the vortex dynamics is highly dependent on the commensurability
effects. When B/
> 1, the interactions
between commensurate vortices and interstitial vortices give rise
to a number of interesting phases, while when
B/
= 1,
a Mott insulator-like phase arises.62
By systematically disordering the positions of the pinning sites
we recover, in the limit of strong disorder,
the dynamical phases found in recent theoretical studies
of random pinning arrays.
4-6,10,14,16,26,31-33
For B/
> 1, and at the onset of depinning
in samples with large disorder, we find a
distinct "channel phase" where long-lived stable
channels, composed predominantly of interstitial
vortices, flow around pinned vortices. Such intermittent channel phases
where some channels form, freeze and reform have previously been noted
in flux-gradient-driven simulations.10,14,33
A phase with a network of flowing channels is also observed
in current-driven samples.
5,6,16,26,31,32
Here, we examine in detail the evolution of the network of
vortex channels. In particular, we show that, although
some channels are short lived, others are
robust under increases of the driving force.
E. Overview
This work is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we describe the samples used, our numerical algorithm, and the parameters varied. In Sec. III, we show in detail the results for a sample with a square array of pinning sites at a field slightly above commensurability. Current-voltage V(I) curves, individual vortex velocity signals, and images of the vortex motion are presented and correlated with each other, explicitly characterizing the different dynamical phases present.
In Sec. IV we obtain a dynamical phase diagram
for the case B >
and explain many of its features
by using force balance arguments which take into account the
interactions between interstitial vortices and vortices in the
pinning sites.
In Sec. V we show that significant hysteresis is found for
certain phases but not for others, and that
the hysteresis is not affected by the sample size.
Sharp discontinuities in V(I), along with the
hysteresis, suggest that some of the
dynamical phase transitions are of first order.
In Sec. VI, we demonstrate the existence of a transverse threshold force, as well as the effect of the onset of motion in the transverse direction on the vortex lattice structure. We also show how the transverse force varies with driving force, and discuss the relevance of these results to the recent work by Giamarchi and Le Doussal.28
In Sec. VII, the V(I) curves and the phase diagram for varying
vortex-pin commensurability are
presented. We find that the various dynamic phases strongly depend on
the commensurability ratio B/
.
For
< B< 2
,
we observe up to six distinct dynamic phases
that arise from the interactions of two species of vortices.
For B > 2
we observe several additional phases.
At B/
=1, only two phases are observed,
and the critical depinning force reaches its highest level,
reminiscent of the so-called "Mott-insulator" phase.
For B/
< 1,
we demonstrate that the initial plastic
flow occurs by the motion of vacancies.
In Sec. VIII, we derive the dynamic phase diagram produced when varying the pinning radius. For pins of small radius, we observe a remarkable reentrant disordered dynamic phase. In between these disordered-motion phases there is a channel phase in which the majority of vortices flow in narrow well-defined interstitial channels. This motion is characterized both by a linear Ohmic response in the V(I) curve and by a reduction in voltage fluctuations. We also find that near the boundaries of this channel phase the system exhibits some interesting hysteresis effects. We show the effects of this reentrant behavior on the percentage of sixfold coordinated vortices in the sample. For certain pinning radii, some transitions among the various plastic flow regimes are marked by a large drop in the number of mobile vortices. We argue that this drop is a force driven dynamical analog of the thermally driven peak effect observed close to Tc. 19-21,23
In Sec. IX, we show the effects on the dynamic phase diagrams of gradually increasing the spatial disorder of the pin array. In the case of large spatial disorder we recover results consistent with studies on totally random pinning arrays. We also present evidence for the existence of distinct regimes of predominantly interstitial channel flow near the initial depinning transition. The characteristics of the channels are also discussed.
In Sec. X we plot the phase diagram for increasing the vortex-vortex interaction strength by means of increasing the vortex density. In Sec. XI we present results for a system with a triangular pinning array. These qualitatively resemble most of the results from the earlier sections, although the flow of vortices in some of the dynamic phases differs from the flow found for the square pinning arrays. In Sec. XII, we summarize our results and discuss their relevance to experimentally realizable systems.
We model a transverse two-dimensional (2D)
slice (in the x-y plane) of an infinitely
long (in the z direction)
parallelepiped with periodic boundary conditions
in which stiff vortex lines are parallel to the sample
edges (i.e, H=H
).
Inside the sample, the interacting vortices are driven by a Lorentz force
over a quenched pinning background.
We numerically integrate the overdamped equations of motion:
fi=fivv+fivp+fd=
vi. (1)
Here, fi is
the total force acting on vortex i, fivv
is the force on the ith vortex due to interactions
with other vortices, fivp
is the vortex-pin interaction force, and fd
is the driving force; vi is the net velocity of vortex
i and
is the viscosity, which is set equal to unity in this work.
The vortex-vortex interaction
between two vortices located at ri and
rj is correctly modeled by a modified Bessel function.
Thus the force acting on a vortex i due to other vortices is
(2)
Here

=hc/2e
is the elementary flux quantum,
is
the penetration depth, Nv is the number of vortices, and
=(ri-rj)/|ri-rj|.
The force between two vortices
decreases exponentially at distances larger than
, and we
cut off the then negligible
force for distances greater than 6
.
We also place a cutoff on the logarithmic divergence of the forces
for distances less than
0.1
.
These cutoffs were found to produce negligible effects
on the dynamics for the range of parameters investigated. Throughout this
work forces are measured in units of f0, lengths
in units of
,
and fields in units of
/
.
The pinning is modeled as Np short-range parabolic wells
located at positions r(p)k.
The total force on a vortex from other vortices and pinning is
(3)
Here,
is the Heaviside step function, rp is the range of the
pinning potential, fp is the maximum pinning force of each well,
measured in units of f0, and
=(ri-rk(p))/|ri-rk(p)|.
The pinning sites are placed in periodic arrays with a lattice constant
a.
The driving force fd is modeled as a constant force
which is slowly
increased or decreased linearly with time.
In implementing the parallelization of the code we take advantage of the cut-off in the vortex interaction range. Using a one-dimensional domain decomposition, we divide the simulation sample into strips that are multiples of the interaction range in width. Each strip is placed on a separate node, and message-passing techniques61 are used at the processor boundaries. Since the vortex-vortex interaction has a finite range, any one strip only needs to communicate with its two neighboring strips. Due to periodic boundary conditions the code is run on an even number of nodes. Load balancing is simplified by the repulsive nature of the vortex interaction which tends to spread the vortices evenly among the processors. With flexible domain decomposition the number of processors can be varied without affecting the results. The code is run on a IBM SP parallel computer.
B. Parameters
We typically increase the driving force by 0.0005f0 every
400 MD steps for a range of fd ranging from 0 to 0.85f0;
using slower rates produces negligible differences.
For this work we
consider the driving force to be in the x-direction along a
symmetry axis of the periodic pinning array.
We examine the average of the velocities
in the x-direction
(4)
as a function of driving,
writing out Vx every 100 to 400 MD steps.
This quantity is
related to a macroscopic measured voltage-current
V(I) curve. Here, Nv is the total number of flux lines in the
system.
Since MD simulations are computationally intensive, and we wish to vary many parameters in order to investigate several phase diagrams and generate a complete picture of the dynamic phases, considerable effort has been put into optimizing our algorithm. We use a cell-index method as well as force tables for the vortex-vortex and vortex-pin interactions so that excessive function calls are avoided during program execution. More importantly, the simulation also uses a high performance parallel processing technique.
We focus on a system of size
36
x 36
;
however, to study finite size effects,
we have also computed several hysteresis runs with system sizes
of up to
72
x 72
.
The parameters we vary
include
the vortex density nv, the
pinning site density np,
radius rp, strength fp, and spatial distribution.
We will consider only the case where
the vortex lattice is driven along a symmetry axis of the
periodic pinning array. Results for general driving
driving angles will be presented
elsewhere.15
We use pinning parameters that are
experimentally accessible and are close to those used
in recent experiments.51,52
For the density of pinning sites we
have investigated a range from
np=0.1/
to 0.7/
,
and the corresponding number of pinning sites
varies from Np= 130 to Np= 907, respectively.
Experiments use samples with a fairly low density of pinning sites, so
we focus on a square array with a
pinning density of np= 0.25/
,
as found in the experiments described in
Refs. 51 and 52.
We focus on the vortex motion
near the first matching field B/
=1, and
systematically examine the change in dynamics as
B/
is varied.
In order to separate the different effects that each of the pinning
and system parameters (i.e, H, fp,
) have
on the dynamics of the
vortices, we fix all the parameters and vary only one in each of the
sections of this paper. Moreover, in order to distinguish the effects
of disorder caused by the pinning from that caused by thermal effects,
we set T=0. Since we are dealing with square
arrays of pinning sites near
, the
ground state vortex
configuration is a square lattice commensurate with the pinning sites.

=0.94, fp=0.625f0,
rp=0.3
,
=0.25
/
,
and fd=0.
In (b) the same parameters as in
(a) are used but now
B/
=1.06. Vortices are indicated by black dots and
pinning sites (that are placed in a square array) are denoted by
open circles.
In (a) the vortex lattice has three vacancies
and no interstitials.
In (b) all the pinning sites are
occupied and five interstitial vortices can be seen in the
areas between the pins.
In Figs. 1(a) and 1(b), the positions of the vortices and pinning sites
are shown for B/
< 1, (a),
and B/
> 1, (b).
Vacancies appear in Fig. 1(a)
and interstitial vortices are present in Fig. 1(b).
The initial
ground states are obtained in one of two ways. The first is
simulated annealing, in which we start from a high-temperature vortex
lattice and cool it down. In the
second approach, we put down a commensurate vortex
configuration and randomly add vortices to the interstitial regions
for B/
> 1 or randomly remove
vortices
to create vacancies for B/
< 1. For
B near
, the resulting
dynamics are identical using either method.

=1.062,
rp=0.3
, and
=0.25
/
,
with the pinning sites located
in a square array and different pinning forces:
(a) fp=0.625f0,
(b) fp=0.37f0,
and weak pinning case (c)
fp=0.187f0.
The driving force fd is linearly increased slowly from 0
to 0.825f0.
In (a) several remarkable jumps in the
curve can be clearly seen. These correspond to transitions
between different phases in the dynamical
behavior of the driven lattice.
We have labeled these phases using Roman numerals.
In region I the net velocity is 0, corresponding to a pinned phase.
In region II, a finite velocity Vx
appears and the system exhibits a linear Ohmic
behavior. Region III, falling
between fd
0.41f0 and
fd
0.46f0 in (a),
has its boundaries marked by sharp jumps in Vx.
The fluctuations in the velocities
Vx
in this phase
are much more pronounced than the velocity fluctuations in region II.
Phase IV, falling between
fd
0.46f0 and
fd~0.61f0 in (a),
corresponds to the 1D incommensurate phase,
where both the average velocity Vx and the average velocity
fluctuations are smaller than in region III.
Phase V corresponds to the phase spanning
fd
0.62f0
in which the entire vortex lattice is moving, but with the
commensurate rows moving more slowly than the incommensurate ones. There is
no recrystallization at higher driving forces and the vortex motion
is always plastic.
In (b), for weak pinning
the vortex flow goes directly from the pinned phase I to region III, with
the interstitial-flow phase II lost. In (c) for even weaker pinning
the vortex flow goes directly from region I to region IV, with phases
II and III lost.
> 1
[illustrated in Fig. 1(b)] and fp=0.625f0 (a),
0.37f0 (b), and 0.187f0 (c).
The strong-pinning V(I) curve in (a) exhibits
several remarkable features which can be clearly seen as
discontinuous jumps in the net vortex velocity
in the x-direction, Vx.
In the first part of the curve, as the driving force is increased,
the velocity signal is zero, indicating that the
vortex lattice is pinned. At approximately fd=0.146f0,
a finite velocity appears due to the depinning of the
weakly pinned interstitial vortices, and the
V(I) curve becomes linear.
At fd
0.406f0, there is
a very sharp jump up in Vx,
indicating a sudden increase in the number of mobile vortices.
It can be clearly seen that the voltage
fluctuations become much larger after this jump.
At fd
0.462f0, we see a
sudden drop in Vx
and a suppression of the fluctuations in Vx,
indicating that the number of mobile flux lines
has dropped and is remaining constant in number.
Finally, between fd
0.595f0
and fd
0.6125f0, which
is slightly smaller than the pinning force
of each pinning site, fp=0.625f0,
we see another large increase in Vx
that continues until the entire lattice becomes mobile. At this point,
for fd
0.625f0,
the V(I) signature is linear.
Each of these features in the V(I) curve correspond to different
vortex flow regimes which we label I through V.
Region I is the pinned phase, and phases II through IV are plastic flow
phases in which portions of the vortex lattice move while
other portions remain pinned.
Phase II appears only when fp > 0.37f0, and the range of
driving forces over which IV appears increases with increasing
pinning strength.
In Fig. 2(b) for a sample with weaker pinning (fp=0.37f0) phase II is lost and the vortex flow jumps directly to phase III. There is also no sharp discontinuity in the transition from phase II to phase III; however, the transition from region III to region IV still shows a discontinuity. The onset of phase V now occurs at fd=0.37f0=fp. In Fig. 2(c) for a sample with even weaker pinning, (fp=0.187f0), both regions II and III are lost. The vortex flow goes directly from phase I to IV and jumps to phase V at fd=0.187f0. Region V is the homogeneous flow phase where the entire vortex lattice is flowing but doing so plastically.



To show explicitly that the features in the V(I) curves correspond to different nonequilibrium dynamical flow phases, in Figs. 3 and 4 we show a series of snapshots of the vortex positions (left panels) as well as trajectory lines (right panels) indicating where the vortices have flowed during a short period of time for regions II through V of the voltage-current curve in Fig. 2(a). The vortex lattice structure for region I, where the applied driving force is too weak to depin any vortices, is shown in Fig. 1(b). In Figs. 5(a)-5(d) plots of the velocity of an individual vortex versus time for regions II-IV also show the very different types of vortex dynamics present in each phase. It is important to point out that the vortices in interstitial locations are pinned by the magnetic-repulsion caging effect of the vortices trapped at pinning sites.
A. Interstitial 1D vortex channels
Figure 3(a) presents a "snapshot" of the vortex locations
at a single instant in region II of the voltage-current curve.
This figure shows that the mobile interstitial vortices
are located between the rows of pins.
The vortex lattice structure is essentially the same for
regions I and II.
To approximate the percentage of flux lines which are mobile
at a specific driving force, we define the following measure based on the
net velocity in the x-direction:
(5)
For region I,
has a value of
=0.06,
indicating that only the
interstitial vortices are mobile since the percentage of vortices
above
is also
(B-
)/
=0.06.
Figure 3(b) shows the flow
in region II of the V(I) curve with outlines of the paths the vortices
have followed. This confirms that only
the interstitial vortices flow in region II
and that the motion is
constrained to move in 1D channels between the rows of pinning sites
due to the square symmetry imposed by the pinned vortices.
Figure 5(a) shows that the
velocity of the mobile vortices
is never zero and that it has an
oscillatory component65
since the energy landscape
imposed by the vortices pinned at the pinning sites has the
same square periodicity as the pinning array.
B. Phase boundary I-II
For the case of strong pinning
when region II exists, as in Fig. 2(a), we can make a simple estimate
of the threshold driving force needed to depin an interstitial vortex
by considering the balance of forces when there are
two species of vortices, interstitial and pinned.
An interstitial or incommensurate
vortex will feel a force from commensurate pinned vortices
finc-c=fincomm-comm,
forces from other
interstitial vortices finc-inc, and
the driving force fd.
An interstitial vortex will thus remain immobile as long as
finc-c+finc-inc+fd=0.
For the case when there are
few interstitial vortices, as in Fig. 2(a), we consider only
the interactions with the commensurate pinned vortices and
the driving force and neglect the interactions between pairs of
incommensurate vortices.
When there is no driving force the interstitial vortices sit in the center
of the interstitial locations, and each
has four nearest-neighbor commensurate pinned
vortices. As the driving force is increased the interstitial vortex will
start to shift in the interstitial location and experience a restoring force
from the commensurate pinned vortices. Since the vortex interactions
decay exponentially with distance, the dominant restoring force on an
interstitial vortex comes from the four nearest commensurate
pinned neighbors. The maximum restoring force
occurs when the interstitial vortex has shifted
halfway between its zero driving
position and the pinning site. An estimate for the threshold force is
(6)
Using this equation with the parameters from Fig. 2(a), we find that
the onset of region II should occur at a driving force of
fd=0.14f0, which is in
very good agreement with the value of
fd=0.146f0 obtained from the simulations.
C. Disordered 2D vortex motion
In Fig. 2(a), at the onset of
region III we find a significant jump in Vx
indicating a sudden increase in the number of mobile flux lines.
The approximate percent of mobile vortices is now
=0.44,
which indicates that vortices
are now being depinned from the pinning sites since the percentage of
vortices above
remains
=0.06.
Significant fluctuations for phase III
in the V(I) curves can
be seen, indicating that the number of mobile flux lines
is rapidly fluctuating.
Figure 3 presents the vortex positions (c) and trajectories (d) for
region III of Fig. 2(a).
We see that the vortex lattice structure and flow pattern is of
a remarkably different nature than that observed in the interstitial
flow phase II. The vortex lattice
has now become disordered,
and the vortex trajectories are no longer 1D but move in
both the x and y directions. It can be seen that some
pin-to-pin vortex motion now occurs.
Unlike the motion in phase II, where only the interstitial vortices move
and vortices at the pinning sites remain pinned,
all the vortices in region III take part in the motion
with any one vortex moving
for a time and then being temporarily trapped.
Figure 5(b) shows the velocity of a single vortex in region III.
The velocity is not periodic as in phase II,
Fig. 5(a), but shows irregularities, including sharp bursts followed by
periods of no motion.
D. Phase boundary II-III: interstitial and disordered flow phases
To understand the crossover from
the 1D interstitial flow
phase II to the disordered 2D flow region III,
we consider the
balance of forces in a sample with two kinds of vortices,
interstitial and pinned, just as in the crossover from region I to region II.
Interstitial vortices exert a force
finc-c=fincomm-comm
on a commensurate vortex (denoted by the sub-index c) while
commensurate vortices exert a force
fc-c on this vortex.
In the simple case when there are no interstitial vortices,
commensurate vortices stay pinned as long as fd< fp.
When interstitial vortices are present, they move
between the rows of the lattice of pins and exert an
additional force on the pinned vortices, resulting in an earlier depinning
transition. A commensurate vortex at a pinning site
remains pinned by the force from the pinning site as long as the
following force balance inequality holds:
|fp| > |fd + finc-c + fc-c| . (7)
Due to the symmetry of the underlying pinning lattice, it is clear
that the net force from the other commensurate vortices will be
fc-c=0 when every pin is occupied by a
vortex (or for other symmetrical configurations).
Since finc-c is the
sum of all the interactions from mobile interstitial vortices,
finc-c is time-dependent and has a complicated form.

To estimate finc-c,
we consider the case where B is only slightly higher than
. Here,
the interstitial vortices are on average sufficiently far apart
that we can estimate finc-c
from a single interstitial
vortex interacting with commensurate vortices as it
moves between the pinning rows. The force exerted by this interstitial vortex
i on a commensurate vortex j
has a maximum value
when the interstitial vortex reaches the point of its closest
approach to the pinned vortex,
which for a square lattice occurs when the interstitial
vortex is aligned with a column of pinning sites (see Fig. 6).
The distance between vortices i and j at closest approach is
rij=a/2, or half the pinning lattice spacing a.
We also take into account the fact that the pinned vortex
will be shifted slightly from the center of the well both
because of the applied driving force and because of the repulsion
from the interstitial vortex. This adds a small distance, which we
approximate as rp/2, to the distance between the interstitial
vortex and the pinned vortex, giving a total
"distance of closest approach" of approximately
rij
a/2 + rp/2.
In Fig. 6 a schematic diagram of this is presented.
In terms of magnitudes, a
commensurate vortex remains pinned as long as the
following inequality holds:
(8)
(9)
where fij=f0K1(rij/
)
is the force
between the interstitial vortex i and the commensurate vortex j.
Driving forces which satisfy this inequality result in phase-II-type
interstitial flow. As the driving force fd is
increased, the inequality eventually ceases to hold, and an
interstitially moving vortex can cause vortices in the pinning sites
to depin. These depinned vortices move away with
some component of their velocity in the transverse y
direction. As these vortices move, they depin additional vortices
in an irregular fashion, thus producing the transition to the
disordered 2D-flow phase III.
As long as fp < fd, the vortices in the sample can be
temporarily trapped; therefore, not all of the vortices move
simultaneously.
We predict that the transition from
1D interstitial to disordered 2D flow
[i.e., from phase II to phase III in Fig. 2(a)]
should occur when the inequality in (9) no longer holds.
To verify this prediction we consider a sample with
parameters equal to the ones presented in Fig. 2(a), namely,
a=2.0
,
rp=0.3
, and
finc-c=f0K1(1.15)=0.4695f0.
The upward jump in Vx, signaling
the transition between phases II and III,
occurs at fd=0.406f0.
Using inequality (9),
we find that the jump will occur at this value of fd if
fp=0.621f0. This is in very good agreement with the
input value of fp=0.625f0 used for the simulations
shown in Fig. 2(a).
The fact that the calculated value
is somewhat less than the actual value is probably due to
the interactions of other interstitial vortices
which were not taken into account in inequality (9).
E. Flux soliton motion in incommensurate 1D vortex channels
Upon further increasing the driving force fd in Fig. 2(a),
we observe a new nonequilibrium dynamic phase, which we label region IV.
At the onset of this phase, a surprising sharp
drop in Vx occurs,
indicating a decrease in the number
of mobile vortices. In particular,
we find that a fraction

0.24 of
the vortices are mobile, significantly lower than the fraction,

0.44,
that were mobile in phase III.
In Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), we see that the vortex motion
possesses a very different structure and flow pattern
from that of the 1D interstitial flow of phase II
and the random flow of region III. The flow in phase IV
is entirely 1D with the mobile vortices
flowing along the pinning rows, which is distinct from the
1D interstitial flow in phase II
where mobile vortices flowed between the rows.
We observe that the presence of additional vortices in certain rows creates
incommensurate 1D structures
in the form of discommensurations or flux solitons
along the pinning row, and that it is in these rows where motion
occurs65 in the
direction of the driving force fd.
Rows that are commensurate are immobile. Due to the 1D nature of
the incommensurate flow in phase IV,
the voltage fluctuations
Vx
for phase IV are considerably smaller than the
Vx's
found during the random flow of phase III.
It is interesting to point out that the drop in
the fraction of moving vortices
at the III-IV transition implies a
negative differential conductivity
dV/dI < 0.
This behavior is often observed in semiconductors, and can be useful
for certain devices.63
The appearance of 1D motion exactly along the rows of pins
might seem counterintuitive. This is so because
for B/
> 1 and fd=0,
when the vortices are not moving, the only positions for
extra vortices that are stable against perturbations in the
transverse y-direction caused by other interstitial vortices are
the interstitial positions between the rows of pinning,
as in Fig. 1(b).
For moving vortices, the situation is quite different because
the extra vortices in incommensurate rows spend part
of their time in the pinning sites. The pinning
sites create a stabilizing force against perturbations in the
transverse y direction, so that
motion becomes confined to the pinning rows along the longitudinal direction.
The vortex motion occurs only
where one or more incommensurate vortices are located along the row.
As the disturbance or flux soliton
moves, it causes the vortex in front of it to depin and then
this one moves to a point where it will depin the next vortex. From direct
observations of the flux motion, as in Fig. 4(b),
we find that every discommensuration is composed of
four mobile vortices. The periodic-pulse nature of
the discommensuration flow is clearly seen in Fig. 5(c) where
the individual velocity of a single vortex in
region IV from Fig. 2(a) is plotted. An individual vortex moves only
for a short time as the discommensuration moves through
and then is pinned again.
Using the parameters presented in Fig. 2(a), where a fraction
(B-
)/
=0.06
of the vortices are incommensurate, we find that
the total fraction of mobile vortices is about four times higher,
or
=0.24.
F. Phase boundary III-IV
In order to understand when incommensurate vortex motion
along the pinning rows, as seen in phases IV and V,
is stable, we construct a simple force-balance argument.
We consider a force fy in the
transverse y direction that deflects
a vortex away from its longitudinal motion along
the pinning row in the x direction. Suppose that
under the influence of this force fy,
the vortex moves a distance dy
in the transverse y direction equal to rp,
the pinning radius, in time t. Thus,
dy=fyt=rp. (10)
For a particular driving force fd
in the longitudinal x direction, if a vortex can move
a distance dx in the x direction equal to
the pinning lattice constant, a,
within the same time t=dy/fy, the vortex
will feel a pinning force in a direction opposite to fy that
pulls the vortex back into the row a distance:
dx=fdt=a. (11)
We note that in actuality the vortex only spends a finite
amount of time in the pinning site so it is not pulled all the
way to the center of the pinning site;
however, for convenience we assume here that the
vortex is pulled all the way to the center.
From Eqs. (10) and (11) it can be seen that
motion along the row is stable if
(12)
For example, for the parameters in Fig. 2(a), with
rp=0.3
and
a=2.0
,
if the vortex lattice is being driven with a force of
fd=0.5f0 in phase IV
with incommensurate 1D channels on pin rows,
the 1D motion is stable against
perturbations of size fy < 0.075f0.
Note that inequality (12) indicates
that as the size of the pinning sites is increased
(i.e., increasing rp) or the pinning density is increased
(i.e., decreasing a) motion along the rows will be more stable.
Inequality (12)
also erroneously predicts that fy increases linearly with
fd; however, the maximum
possible value for fy for stable vortex motion is fp.

To derive an expression for the increasing driving force at
which region IV appears, we
take into account the fact that there is
an average energy barrier for interstitial vortices
to enter the pinning rows
since vortices at pinning sites tend to keep interstitial vortices
in between the rows.
Once the vortices are in the random-flow phase III, many of the vortices
are moving in interstitial regions and (see Sec. III)
these vortices depin vortices at nearby pinning sites.
As fd increases, pinned vortices become easier to depin and
there is an increase in the
distance rmin from which an interstitial vortex can
depin a pinned vortex, so that
rmin > a/2 + rp/2.
When fd is large enough, rmin
reaches a limiting value such that
a vortex located approximately halfway between two
columns of pinning sites can depin
one of the vortices in the row ahead of it.
A schematic diagram of this situation is presented in Fig. 7.
To verify this, we note that a vortex placed at the center of an interstitial
site exerts a force approximately equal to
fij(a/
+rp)cos(45o)
in the x-direction on a vortex in a pinning site.
As a function of the
driving force fd, the pinning force
fp needed to keep a vortex
pinned at a pinning site when an interstitial vortex is located at the
center of an interstitial site is
, (13)
. (14)
After an interstitial vortex depins a commensurate vortex, it experiences a net force toward the vacated pinning site from the other pinned commensurate vortices. It must travel an approximate distance a/2 in the x direction before it is adjacent to the just vacated pinning site. During this time, however, the depinned vortex also moves a distance a/2 in the x direction as well as a/2 in the y direction and in principle should itself be able to depin another commensurate pinned vortex. The original interstitial vortex is just far enough from the first depinned vortex that it is able to be trapped by the vacant pinning site.
Thus, when fd is large enough, vortices moving in the random 2D flow regime (phase III) will start to become confined along the horizontal pinning rows and, provided that inequality (12) is met, this motion along the pinning rows should be stable. Substituting in inequality (14) the parameters used in Fig. 2(a) and the value of fd=0.406f0 observed at the onset of the 1D incommensurate motion, we find a calculated value of fp=0.624f0, which is in very good agreement with the actual value fp=0.625f0 used in the simulations.
G. Large driving plastic flow phase: IV-V phase boundary
As fd is increased to almost fp, the entire vortex lattice starts to flow in a phase which we label region V. The vortex flow pattern for phase V for the system in Fig. 2(a) is presented in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d). The type of motion and vortex lattice structure in region V resembles that of phase IV with vortices moving in 1D channels along the pinning rows; however, in region V all the vortices are mobile. The velocity of an individual vortex is periodic [as shown in Fig. 5(d)] due to the underlying periodic pinning lattice. Individual vortices can slow down considerably but are never completely repinned, as indicated in Fig. 5(d) by the fact the the velocity is always greater than zero.
The transition from region IV-V in Fig. 2(a)
is not as sharp as that of II-III and III-IV but instead occurs
over the range of
0.595f0
fd
0.613f0.
This can be understood by considering that in region IV certain
rows contain incommensurate mobile vortices. As these vortices move past
pinned vortices in adjacent commensurate rows they will exert
a small force in addition to the driving force that causes the
adjacent commensurate rows to depin
at a driving force lower than
fd=0.625f0.
We also observe that in region V rows with incommensurate numbers of vortices move faster than commensurate rows so that rows with different numbers of vortices slide past one another. Some portions of the vortex lattice can be seen to have triangular order; however, there are portions where this does not hold. A Voronoi analysis gives a probability of sixfold coordinated vortices of P6=0.83. This is less than P6=1 because of the presence of the incommensurate rows. As fd is increased further, the density of defects and structure of the vortex lattice do not change. This result is different from simulations5,6 with random pinning arrays which show that for sufficiently high driving rates, the defects in the vortex lattice heal out and P6=0.95.

=1.062,
rp=0.3
, and
=0.25
/
,
with a square pinning lattice.
Regions I through V
correspond to the same dynamical phases shown in Figs. 2(a), 3, and 4.
For very weak pinning,
fp < 0.1f0, regions II-IV are lost and the vortex
lattice flows elastically both along
the pinning sites and also in the channels
in what we label phase Velastic.
The disordered 2D flow phase
III first appears at
fp
0.25f0
and phase II at fp
0.37f0.
The driving force at which a transition from phase I to II occurs
saturates at a value of
fd
0.146f0,
which corresponds to the force needed to depin an interstitial vortex.
As fd is increased, the phase boundaries II-III, III-IV, and IV-V
become linear. When the depinning scenario
presented in Fig. 7 can take place, the interstitial vortex can
occupy the just vacated pin site. This gives rise to the incommensurate
1D flow of phase IV. If fp is strong enough, the interstitial vortex
of region II will have to reach maximum proximity to the pinned vortex in
order to dislodge it (as shown in Fig. 6). In this case the interstitial
vortex cannot occupy the pin site just vacated. Thus its deflection
along the transverse direction triggers the type of motion in phase III.
For large pinning force fp and medium driving fd,
phase II dominates the phase diagram.
0.146f0.
At this point, the value of the driving force at the transition saturates
because, although the pinning force fp
of the pinning sites is
being increased, the vortex-vortex interaction which determines the
interstitial pinning force is not changed.
A. Onset of phase II
Figure 8 shows that the interstitial
motion of phase II occurs only when
fp
0.37f0.
This can be understood by
considering that when
fp
0.37f0, inequality (9)
cannot be satisfied for any driving force, so that phase II cannot occur,
and thus the boundary between phases I and II stops.
For a pinning force of fp=0.35f0, an interstitial vortex at closest approach exerts a force f0K1(1.3)=0.3725f0 on a vortex at a pinning site. This is greater than the pinning force, so as soon as the interstitial vortices move, they cause vortices at the pinning sites to depin, producing phase III motion. In this case, it is not possible for interstitial vortices to move between the pinning rows without depinning vortices trapped at the pinning sites, so the interstitial 1D motion of region II does not occur for these weak pins. Region II occurs in the phase diagram only for values of fp and fd that satisfy both inequality (9) and inequality (14).
B. Onset of phase III
As fp is increased further, a
stronger driving force is required for the
interstitial vortices moving in phase II to depin commensurate vortices
so that a transition to region III can occur.
The phase boundary line separating phases II and III is expected
to follow the equation
(15)
which for large drives,
fd >> fij(a/2+rp/2), Eq. (15)
reduces to the linear relation
fp
fd, (16)
in good agreement with
the phase diagram in Fig. 8.
Phase III occurs for fp and fd values that satisfy
inequality (14) but violate inequality (9).
Under these conditions, commensurate
vortices can be depinned, but phase IV motion is not yet possible.
C. Onset of phase IV
It is clear from the dynamic phase diagram in Fig. 8 that when fp < 0.25f0, motion begins immediately in phase IV, without passing through phases II and III. For values of fp less than fp=0.25f0, inequality (14) remains invalid for all driving forces so that the initial motion appears as region IV. For example, for fp=0.25f0, motion starts at fd=0.09f0, the right side of inequality (14) is 0.277f0, and the inequality is invalid.
The boundary between phases III and IV satisfies the relation
(14). At high drives, inequality (14) behaves
as fp
fd,
in good agreement with the III-IV boundary in the phase diagram in Fig. 8.
Region IV flow occurs in the portion of the phase
diagram where both inequalities (9) and (14) no longer hold but
fd < fp.
Finally, the phase boundary
between regions IV and V follows the linear
relation of fp
fd.
When fd > fp, the
flow is 2D and not uniform because rows slide past each other.
We point out that in Eq. (1) we have assumed fd to be
uniform on all the vortices, which is the case for thin-film
superconductors where
can be comparable or larger than the system size.
Vortices in thin film superconductors will
interact via a Pearl potential
fvv~1/r rather than the modified Bessel function
which we use. The modified Bessel function is appropriate for
bulk superconductors.
By using these different vortex interactions, the
phase boundaries we observe
may be shifted slightly but the qualitative
features should be the same.
For bulk superconductors an applied current will form a
gradient in the vortex density.
If the pinning is weak, the gradient should be small and the
dynamic phases should
be the same throughout the sample.
For very large flux gradients, different dynamic phases may
occur in different regions of the sample.
In Sec. VII we show how the dynamic phases are modified when
considering samples with different vortex densities.

The fact that phase III appears at all for such a low value of fd may appear to contradict the predictions of inequality (9), which indicates that for fp=0.625f0, region III can only arise when fd > 0.41f0. Inequality (9) is, however, only valid when there are interstitial vortices moving between the rows of pinning. This occurs for the ramp-up part of the hysteresis curve, when there is a transition from phase II to III. In contrast, when a transition from phase IV to III occurs, the vortices are moving along the pinning rows, so there are no interstitial vortices between the rows, and thus inequality (9) does not apply. It is possible for phase III to appear on the reverse path because the extra incommensurate vortices approach pinned vortices closely since they are moving along the pinning rows rather than between the rows.
Region IV persists for so long on the reverse leg because once the 1D incommensurate channels are formed, there is a barrier to perturbations in the transverse-direction, as noted in Sec. III and by inequality (12). This barrier is examined further in the next section. After region III appears on the reverse path, the vortex motion returns to the interstitial flow type seen in phase II.
The hysteresis and the sharp discontinuities in Vx suggest that the transitions from II-III and III-IV are first order. The lack of hysteresis and the absence of sharp discontinuous jumps in Vx suggest that the transitions I-II and III-IV are of second order.
Recently, studies31,32 with random pinning arrays have shown that for large enough driving the moving vortex lattice is anisotropic with long-range order in the transverse direction, but not in the longitudinal direction, and have also provided evidence for a small transverse barrier. In our case, the strongly driven vortices in phase V travel in 1D channels that do not change with time in the transverse direction, as can be seen in Fig. 4(d). Because commensurate and incommensurate rows move at different speeds, the vortex lattice is not moving elastically but plastically. Furthermore, it can be seen that the vortex lattice in region V (strongly driven homogeneous flow) is anisotropic. Vortices are evenly spaced along the transverse direction a distance a, the pinning lattice constant, apart; but due to the presence of incommensurate vortices, the vortex lattice is not evenly spaced along the longitudinal direction.
The vortex motion of phase V is somewhat analogous to a series of weakly coupled 1D Frenkel-Kontorova chains. Note that this kind of transport with fast (incommensurate) and slow (commensurate) moving vortex lanes is significantly different from the elastic transport of the "moving crystal" predicted for systems with random arrays of pins.6

To test for the presence of
a finite transverse barrier, a force fy
in the transverse direction was applied to a moving lattice
for samples with the same parameters
as in Fig. 2(a). The lattice was driven at
fd=0.8f0, which puts the sample in phase V.
In Fig. 10(a) we show the V(I) curve in which Vy,
,
the sum of the net velocities in the y direction at one instant,
is plotted versus fy.
As fy is increased, the lattice remains locked in the 1D
paths and moves only along the longitudinal
x direction until
fy
0.075f0, at
which point the vortex lattice starts to move in the
y-direction as well. This result clearly shows the existence of
a finite transverse critical force for the strongly driven region V.
To further characterize the onset of motion in the y direction,
in Fig. 10(b) we plot the fraction of sixfold coordinated
vortices, P6, as fy is increased. For values of
fy that are too small
to cause the vortices to move in the y direction, we find
P6
0.82,
with the defects occurring due to
the incommensurate vortices. At the onset of motion in the
transverse direction, the vortex lattice shows a sharp decrease
in P6 to a value of
P6
0.7,
which indicates a change in the vortex
lattice structure to a more disordered state. This implies that,
even though the vortex lattice is moving, the depinning in the
transverse direction
is similar to the depinning of a pinned static vortex
lattice where the vortex lattice becomes more disordered at the
initial depinning transition.6,13,17,26,32
Once the vortex lattice starts moving in the transverse direction
it is no longer being driven along a symmetry axis of the pinning
lattice, so the pinning lattice appears more disordered.
As fy is increased, the vortex lattice regains its order
up to P6
0.96.
This higher degree of order indicates that the
defects caused by the incommensurate vortices
that were locked into the vortex lattice in region V heal
out once the symmetry of the pinning lattice is broken.
Simulations5,6,26 where
the vortex lattice is driven over a random distribution
of pinning sites find that at high drives
P6
0.95 or higher.
These results suggest that one way to experimentally
observe the effects of a finite transverse barrier on a moving
vortex lattice is by
looking for a change in the vortex lattice structure at the onset of
motion in the transverse direction.

We examine the dependence of the transverse force on the driving
force in order to determine how the transverse force varies in each
phase and to test the predictions of inequality (12). In Fig. 11, we
plot the critical transverse force fyc
versus driving force fd for a sample with the
same parameters as in Fig. 2(a).
For driving forces that satisfy
0.2f0 < fd < 0.4f0
the system is in phase II. Here the
transverse critical force fyc
linearly decreases as fd
approaches the II-III transition at
fd
0.4f0. This
agrees well with inequality (9) that indicates that
as fd is increased in
phase II, the force needed for an interstitial vortex to depin a commensurate
vortex decreases.
The transverse critical force reaches its lowest value of
fyc
0.01f0
in the disordered-flow phase III,
0.406f0 < fd < 0.46f0,
and then very sharply increases as the system enters phase IV.
The transverse critical force reaches a maximum of
fyc
0.09f0
just before the onset of
region V at fd=0.61f0.
The response falls to
fyc
0.075f0 for
phase V. A more detailed study of how the
barrier depends on the
microscopic pinning parameters as well as how
the vortex motion and structure changes with
an applied transverse force
will be presented elsewhere.15
of the vortex lattice with respect to the substrate.
By increasing B/
we
can observe the effects of increasing interactions between the
interstitial vortices and see how the phases investigated in
section IV are altered.
By decreasing B/
to values less than one, we consider fields below the first matching field and
observe the dynamical effects of vacancies in the commensurate vortex lattice.
We change B/
by
varying the number of vortices Nv
for a fixed number of pinning sites Np and
we monitor the change in behavior of the flow regimes
found for the phase diagram in section III, where
B/
was fixed at
B/
=1.0625.

versus fd
with rp=0.3
,
fp=0.625f0, and
=0.25
/
with a square pinning array.
For 1 < B/
< 1.3, phases I through V
can be observed, with the 2D disordered-flow phase III
growing with B and the ordered flow phases
II and IV reducing in size for increasing B. The solid
horizontal line at
B =
indicates the vortex lattice is pinned up to
fd=fp. Above
B/
=1.3, regions IV and V disappear and
two new phases, VI and VII, appear. The solid horizontal
line at B=2
indicates that the vortex lattice is pinned
up to fd
0.15f0.
For B/
> 2 the pinned region
I shrinks drastically and a new phase VIII appears.
At B/
=1 only two phases are found with
I for fd/f0 < 0.6 and V for
fd/f0 > 0.62.
For B/
< 1,
region I is significantly larger than for
B/
> 1.
Phase IVvac corresponds to the "vacancy flow" regime.
In Fig. 12 we present the phase diagram in which
fp=0.625f0, rp=0.3
,
and
=0.25
/
are kept fixed, while B/
is
varied from 0.75 to 2.296,
so that we can observe the vortex dynamical phases
for B both above and below
and 2
.
The dynamical phases labeled I through V correspond to
the same phases discussed in section III. Figure 12 was obtained from a
systematic study involving more than 25 separate simulations, each
one spanning a wide range of driving forces.

=1.34 and
fd=0.625f0. Here we can see that the vortices travel
mainly in 1D paths as in regions II
(1D interstitial motion),
IV (1D incommensurate flow along the pinning sites) and V.
However,
in region VI motion occurs anywhere in the interstitial
areas as well as along the pinning rows.
A. Above the first matching field:
< B < 2
First, let us consider the cases for
B/
just above one. Here, Fig. 12 shows
the five phases present from section III [see, e.g., Fig. 2(a)]. Phase III,
the random 2D motion regime, starts to grow for increasing
B/
while the more ordered-motion regions II and IV
shrink. This is expected since an increase in
B/
effectively introduces disorder via the addition of more
interstitial vortices.
As the density of interstitial vortices increases, second or
higher-neighbor interstitial vortex interactions
become important and cause the vortices at the pinning sites to depin
at lower driving rates, leading to the shrinking of phase II.
Similarly, the width of region IV will be reduced since
for larger B/
there will be a larger
Vy
produced by the additional interstitial vortices.
This inhibits confinement of the moving vortices along
the pinning rows until higher drives are applied.
For B/
> 1.3,
phase V disappears and the
vortices no longer flow strictly along the rows of pinning
pinning sites. Instead, a considerable number of vortices flow in
1D channels through the
interstitial areas, as shown in the snapshot in Fig. 13.
We label this type of flow phase VI. The vortex flow in region VI is generally
plastic and exhibits some properties similar to those of phase III; however,
unlike region III, vortices are never pinned and always
have a non-zero velocity. The transition
from phase III to phase VI is not abrupt but occurs
continuously as indicated by the dashed line in Fig. 12. No hysteresis in
V(I) is observed at the III-VI phase boundary,
further indicating the continuous nature of the transition.
We also observe that in phase VI for drives fd > fp,
the vortex lattice usually displays a higher degree of ordering.
This ordering is highly dependent on
B/
;
for example, when B/
= 1.7 the vortex lattice is
completely ordered at high drives and flows elastically.
The higher amount of ordering
in region VI does not noticeably affect the V(I) curves.

=1.72.
In (a) phase VII first appears at fd=0.21f0
in the form of a jump in the V(I) curve.
The average velocity Vx increases
linearly throughout region VII until
fd
0.3f0,
when another jump in V(I) occurs and the system
shifts to the 2D phase III.
In (b) further evidence that region VII is
a distinct phase appears as a small hysteresis around the III-VII
transition. When ramping down the driving current,
a slightly greater number of mobile vortices are present in region VII
and this phase persists down to a lower value
of fd than the value at which it first appeared on the
increasing-drive leg. Note that there is no sharp jump and
no hysteresis in the V(I) curve for the
III to VI transition. This phase boundary can be identified by examining
the vortex lattice motion.

B/
< 2.
Here the vortices can be seen traveling through
specific interstitial flow paths somewhat
resembling those in the 1D interstitial flow phase II. Unlike in
region II, the paths in region VII wind considerably and
contain large numbers of depinned commensurate vortices.
The commensurate vortices depin at the jump in
the V(I) curve seen in Fig. 14.
Near B/
1.7
and fd
0.25f0
we find evidence for a new phase that we label VII.
The onset of this phase appears in
Fig. 14(a) as a clear jump in the V(I) curve
near fd
0.21f0.
This jump is
followed by a linear or Ohmic region which ends when another jump
into phase III occurs at
fd
0.3f0.
We verify the existence of a new dynamic phase by observing the vortex flow
patterns plotted in Fig. 15.
In phase VII whole rows of vortices that were commensurate with
the pinning sites are depinned
and begin to flow in the interstitial regions. These vortices follow
stationary well-defined winding paths unlike the
transient time dependent paths seen in phase III. Since
the number of moving vortices remains constant
as the driving force is increased throughout phase VII, the velocity of these
vortices increases linearly and an Ohmic response is
observed. The initial jump in the V(I) curve at
fd
0.21f0
occurs when a portion of the commensurate vortices
are suddenly depinned.
Further evidence that region VII is
a distinct dynamical phase is presented in
Fig. 14(b). Here, some
hysteresis occurs in the phase transition from VII to II
with region VII persisting to lower forces on the
ramp down.
B. Second matching field: B=2
We observe only three dynamic phases
at the second matching field B/
=2,
where the vortex lattice is commensurate with the pinning lattice
and forms a square lattice at 45o
with respect to the pinning lattice.
As seen in Fig. 12,
the phase transition from I to II occurs at a driving force of
fd
0.15f0,
approximately the value needed to depin a
single interstitial vortex. For fields
1 < B/
< 2 the
transition occurs at lower drives due to the presence of
defects in the interstitial lattice.
The interstitial flow for B/
= 2
in phase II differs slightly from that found
for B/
> 2 and
B/
< 2 since
at B/
= 2 the interstitial
vortices form a defect free lattice that
flows elastically with
respect to other interstitial vortices.
At higher or lower fields, defects cause some
rows of the interstitial lattice to flow at different speeds
from other rows in a
manner similar to phase V. Phases VII and III, which are
observed for B/
< 2, are absent when
B/
2
and the transition to phase VI,
which is continuous for fields
B/
< 2, is marked by a
sharp jump for B/
2.

= 2.15. Here the pinned vortex phase I
ends at a much lower driving force than for
B/
< 2 since the
additional interstitial vortices that have been added to the
B/
= 2
lattice are less strongly pinned than the interstitial
vortices in a lattice with
1 < B/
2.
The new phase of interstitial vortices (for
B > 2
) is labeled region VIII.
The usual 1D interstitial-flow
phase II appears at
fd
0.14f0 and
the system then jumps to
region VI at fd
0.39f0.
In (b) strong hysteresis from phase VI to II is observed
with region VI persisting down to about
fd
0.25f0. The flow
enters phase VII as the driving force is further decreased
and then moves to region VIII.

.
In (a), fd=0.1f0 and 1D motion occurs
only in rows where there is an extra interstitial vortex.
A single vortex does not move continuously across
the sample, instead as it travels the discommensuration
pushes each vortex one lattice site in the direction of motion
in a manner resembling the flow in the 1D incommensurate-flow phase IV.
In (b),
the driving force has been increased to
fd=0.35f0, and
fd=0.35f0, and all the interstitial vortices are mobile.
The interstitial motion shown here is more coherent than the
phase II flow observed for B/
< 2.
C. Above the second matching field: B > 2
Above the second matching field, the pinned phase I shrinks considerably as
seen in the V(I) curves of Fig. 16(a).
The shrinking occurs when extra interstitial vortices appear in the
commensurate interstitial lattice present at
B/
=2
and begin to flow before the commensurate interstitial vortex lattice flows.
This shrinking of phase I for
B/
> 2 resembles
the shrinking of phase I just above
B/
= 1, when interstitial
vortices appear in the commensurate pinned vortex lattice.
An extra interstitial vortex in the
B/
= 2 interstitial
lattice exerts an additional force on the vortex just ahead of it,
reducing the required depinning force.
The flow of the interstitial vortices just above the depinning current
is labeled phase VIII. Snapshots of region VIII
in Fig. 17(a) show that only rows containing extra
interstitial vortices move. The vortices do not move continuously
as in phase II; instead,
the vortices move in small localized pulses similar
to those observed in phase IV.
The phase diagram in Fig. 12 shows that as B is increased further
above 2
the transition from region I to region VIII occurs
for lower driving forces
fd
0.02f0.
At fd
0.146f0 all
the interstitial vortices start to flow
and the system enters phase II, indicated by a jump in
the V(I) curve in Fig. 16(a). At the onset of phase II
(fd
0.146f0),
the interstitial vortices
first start to flow in a disorganized way with rows
moving at different speeds. Near
fd
0.23f0 the
interstitial vortices begin flowing in a coherent manner, with
all rows that contain an equal number of vortices flowing
at the same speed.
Rows containing extra interstitial vortices move at different speeds.
In Fig. 17(b) the flow pattern for the coherently
flowing vortices in phase II is illustrated.
The onset of the more coherent flow appears
in the V(I) curve as an increase in
the amplitude of
Vx.
Regions VII and III do not appear for
B/
> 2.
Instead the transition from phase II to
phase VI is marked by a very pronounced
jump in V(I) seen in Fig. 16(a). The strong hysteresis
associated with the VI to II transition appears in Fig. 16(b).
On the ramp down of fd, region VI persists down to
fd
0.25f0, a driving force
slightly greater than the force at which
the coherent phase II motion appears on the ramp up. As the driving force is
further decreased
a sharp drop in the voltage occurs and the system enters a flow phase that
resembles region VII, where whole rows of pinning sites are unoccupied as
interstitial vortices flow continuously around a smaller portion of pinned
vortices. Phase VII does not appear when increasing the driving force.
As fd is reduced
further, another drop in V(I) occurs
as vortices become pinned in the empty rows of pins.
The vortex flow then returns to phase VIII.
D. At commensurability: B=
At B/
= 1, the commensurate case, we
find only two phases: a pinned regime
for fd/f0
0.6,
and a flowing regime for
fd/f0
0.6, with the
depinning transition occurring approximately at
fd
fp=0.625f0.
This is a direct consequence of the existence of only
one species of mobile vortices rather than the two species
required to generate the other phases.
All critical driving force values reach their highest levels for this case.
The enhancement of the critical force and reduction of the
vortex mobility for this commensurate case is consistent
with magnetization experiments,51,52,54,59,60
direct imaging experiments56 and
simulations10 as well
as with resistance measurements in
Josephson junction arrays.44.
This enhancement of the critical current
can also be considered as a realization of the Mott-insulator
phase.62
The vortex motion in phase V is different
at commensurability and away from commensurability.
For B >
and B<
,
the presence of incommensurate vortices causes certain rows
of moving vortices to slide past
each other. For B=
, however,
the vortex lattice flows
elastically since all the rows move at the same speed.
Thus for this commensurate case a "moving crystal" can be realized.
E. Below commensurability: B<
For B/
< 1,
the critical force for vortex motion drops
well below the value at B=
, and
three dynamical phases appear plus the pinned phase.
The pinned phase I extends to higher driving forces
than for the B/
> 1 case since there are no
weakly-pinned interstitial vortices present.
The moving phases consist of an initial
randomlike flow regime that resembles phase III
and a vacancy-flow regime,
which we label phase IVvac. In the latter regime, the
vortex motion consists of jumps from pinning site to pinning site
along the pinning rows,
which also corresponds to a vacancy or a hole moving in the
opposite direction.

=0.94 for region IVvac
in a sample with the same pinning parameters as in Fig. 12.
Shown is a
20
x 20
region that contains 100 pinning sites, 98 vortices, and
two mobile vacancies with fd=0.57f0.
The vacancies move towards the left in
1D paths along the pinning rows in
the opposite direction of the eastbound vortex motion.
As each vacancy moves, it displaces the neighboring
vortex just behind it by
one pinning lattice constant a. These vacancies move much
faster than the vortices themselves. Rows that contain no vacancies
are immobile.
Figure 18 explicitly shows the vacancy motion of region IVvac.
This 1D motion
is very similar to that seen in phase IV, where motion
occurs for incommensurate rows and commensurate rows remain pinned.
In this case the discommensurations are due to vacancies rather than
interstitials.
A vortex i to the west of a vacancy feels an extra force of
fij(a), where fij is the vortex-vortex interaction,
in the direction of the eastbound driving force,
so these vortices become mobile at a lower fd than
vortices not located near vacancies. The vacancy flow regime
should occur when the following inequalities hold:
fd < fp < fd + fij(a), (17)
thus, when
fp-fd < fij(a).
For our parameters [with a=2
,
fp=0.624f0, and
fij(a)=0.15f0],
we find from inequality (17)
that the vacancy motion should first occur
at a driving force of
fd
0.47f0, which is
in good agreement with the value obtained from the simulation.
The force needed to move a vacancy is much larger then the force
needed to move an interstitial vortex
since in order for a vacancy to move,
a vortex must be depinned from a pinning site. This result has also been
observed in recent imaging experiments.56
At fd=0.6f0
fp,
the entire vortex lattice becomes mobile. This phase,
which we label Vvac, is very similar
to the flow found in region V, where incommensurate rows
move faster than commensurate rows. In this case, the
incommensurate rows have fewer vortices than pinning
sites. No hysteresis is found in the V(I) curves for
B <
.

=0.25
/
,
and B/
=1.062 with a square pinning array.
Here rp is varied from 0.125
to
0.35
. As rp is increased,
phases II and IV grow while phases I and III shrink in size. At
rp
0.175
,
a new phase, region IX, appears. This phase is
located between two phases of region III motion;
thus, phase III for rp < 0.175
exhibits a striking reentrant behavior
as a function of driving.
=0.25
/
,
and B/
=1.0625 are used,
while rp is systematically varied from
0.1
to 0.375
.
We see that as rp is increased,
the width of phase I is slightly reduced.
This can be understood when we consider that vortices in the pinning sites
can move a further distance rp away from the
moving interstitial vortices while still remaining pinned, thus
reducing the interstitial pinning force and slightly lowering the
driving force required to initiate motion.
As rp is increased, the ordered flow phases II and IV grow in size while the disordered flow region III shrinks. The increase in phase II is explained by the fact that in larger pinning sites the pinned vortices can move further away from the interstitial vortices, increasing the quantity fmin(a/2 + rp/2) in inequality (8) that marks the II-III phase boundary. Thus, a higher driving force is now needed for the inequality to remain valid and for phase III to appear.
The growth of phase IV results from the fact that larger pinning sites better stabilize vortices moving along the pinning row since the vortices move a smaller distance a-2rp between pinning sites. Region IV should also be more stable for larger pins since a higher transverse force is predicted by inequality (12).

(top curve) and
0.35
(lower curve,
with smaller peak around
fd
0.43f0)
for samples with the same parameters as in Fig. 19.
This figure shows the remarkable difference in the shape of the
curves. For rp=0.2
, phase III is
much larger; also its III-IV phase boundary
is marked by a sudden and large drop in the voltage.
A. Dynamic "peak" effect
In order to emphasize the very different behaviors
that occur when decreasing rp, in Fig. 20
we present the voltage-current curves for the same parameters used in
Fig. 2(a) but with a smaller and larger pinning radius:
rp=0.2
(curve with larger arch
around fd/f0
0.3 - 0.5)
and rp=0.35
(curve with the much
smaller phase III).
It is interesting to note that the same number of vortices are mobile
in both systems for region IV around
fd/f0
0.58,
since the net velocities Vx are approximately equal.
In Fig. 20 we can
see the striking discontinuous large drop in the number
of mobile vortices at the phase transition from phase III to IV around
fd/f0
0.56
for the rp=0.2
system,
indicated by the sudden decrease in Vx.
For the rp=0.35
case,
this jump occurs much earlier
around fd/f0
0.44
and is significantly smaller.
The decrease in the number of mobile vortices at the transition from phase III (disordered flow) to phase IV (1D incommensurate channels) is reminiscent of the peak effect where an increase in Jc occurs as the temperature or field is raised. The dynamic "peak" effect we observe here occurs due to an increase in the driving force rather than an increase in the field or temperature. The usual peak effect is believed to be associated with a dynamical transition from elastic flow to plastic motion of vortices.18-20 In Fig. 20 the phase transition III-IV is between two different plastic flow regimes: from random flow (III) to 1D incommensurate channels (IV). It is also possible to observe the transition from region III to IV in our system by maintaining a constant driving force and decreasing the field, as can be seen from the phase diagram in Fig. 12; by varying the pin radius, as indicated by the phase diagram in Fig. 19; or by changing the pinning force, as shown in Fig. 8.

.
Regions I, II, III, IV, and V
correspond to the dynamic phases discussed in Sec. III.
Phase IX occurs at the interval
(0.31f0
fd
0.4f0)
of the voltage-current curve where the
fluctuations
Vx
in the velocity Vx become significantly smaller than
fluctuations in the surrounding regions. In this phase IX
the voltage-current curve is approximately linear. In (b)
the fraction of six-sided Voronoi polygons is presented. In
regions IX and V, there is a relatively high P6.
The value of P6 is relatively low for the pinned phase I since
the underlying lattice is square.
B. Dynamic "winding interstitial" phase
At a pinning radius
rp=0.175
, a new phase emerges that
was not seen in our other phase diagrams.
Figure 21 shows the voltage-current curve for this case.
We increase the driving force and observe the dynamic phases which
appear beyond phase II ( 1D interstitial flow).
In Fig. 21 we can first see region I, the pinned phase, and phase
II, the 1D interstitial flow phase.
These are then followed by the
onset of a disordered flow region III, which we also confirm by directly
viewing the moving lattice. Above phase III,
the fluctuations
Vx
in the voltage-current plot are clearly reduced
and the V(I) curve becomes linear, suggesting
the presence of different dynamics from
the random flow regime. We label this new region IX.
Beyond phase IX the motion once again becomes
disordered and region III reappears.
This is followed by a narrow phase IV, where the flow
is 1D incommensurate along the horizontal pin rows,
and then the whole lattice starts to flow in
phase V.
To further characterize the motion in phase IX, we compute the
evolution of the Voronoi construction and show in Fig. 21(b) the fraction of
six-sided polygons P6 as a function of the driving force
fd. Here we
can see that the initial vortex lattice configuration has a very low
fraction P6
0.38
of six-sided polygons, which is due to the
fact that the underlying pinning lattice is square. Those
six-sided polygons which appear in the pinned region are a result
of both the small number of incommensurate vortices and the Voronoi
algorithm used, as square polygons are very sensitive to small
distortions or displacements
and are likely to appear as polygons with more than four sides.
As fd is increased, a slight increase in P6
occurs at the onset of phase II when the interstitial vortices depin.
At the beginning of region III
another increase in P6 appears since the square
symmetry is lost in the random-flow motion.
At the onset of region IX there is
a sharp increase in the number of six-sided polygons corresponding
to the ordering of the lattice at this stage. In this region
P6 reaches a local
maximum value of P6
0.8. At the
transition to this reentrant
disordered motion phase III, there is another drop in P6
to an average value of P6
0.58.
As the lattice finally moves out of region IV and into region V,
the number of six-sided
polygons once again rises to P6
0.9.
It does not reach
P6=1.0 because of the 1D incommensurate structure of phase V.

,
=0.25
/
,
and B/
=1.062.
Here the vortex lattice is relatively ordered and features interstitial flow
around a small number of pinned vortices. In (b) we see that the
flow occurs in channels that do not change in time. Bends in the channels
occur near pinned vortices. This phase differs from phase VIII in that the
latter has a much larger fraction of pinned vortices.
To show conclusively that region IX in Fig. 21 represents
a new dynamical phase, in Fig. 22 we plot
a snapshot of the vortex lattice (a) and the vortex trajectories (b) in
phase IX. Here we can see a
remarkably different behavior from that observed earlier.
The vortices travel in well defined
flow channels with most of the vortices
moving between the horizontal pinning rows and
a small number of vortices pinned at the pinning sites.
The motion is distinct from the interstitial flow of
phase II where only a small number
of interstitial vortices were mobile and all the pinning sites
were occupied. The motion is not in straight
1D paths along the longitudinal-direction, as in phases I, IV and V,
but wanders in the transverse direction. As can be seen in Fig. 22(b),
the wandering is caused when the flowing interstitial vortices are deflected
by a small number of pinned vortices.
The trajectory lines show that the vortices travel
in paths which are stationary in time.
There is also no depinning of vortices from the pinning sites.
This behavior is very different from that seen in phase III, where
the channels are changing rapidly
as a function of time, and vortices continuously depin and become pinned.
Interestingly, the number of
vortices pinned at the pinning sites is exactly the number of
extra vortices above
.
After region IX, as the driving force is increased, the flow
reenters phase III when the combination of the
driving force and perturbations from interstitially moving vortices
begin to depin the vortices at the pinning sites.

.
In (a) the maximum driving force is brought up to
fd=0.75f0 at which point the vortices are in the
phase V flow. The reverse or ramp down curve retraces V and then
enters region IV which is not seen on the ramp up.
Notice that the percentage of mobile vortices is significantly smaller
during the ramp down, as indicated by the much lower value of Vx.
From phase IV the flow jumps up to region III and phase IX
does not appear on the
ramp down. In (b) the driving force is brought up to a maximum of
fd=0.59f0, at which point the vortices are in phase III.
In the reverse curve, region IX
persists well below the driving force at which it appears on the ramp up,
passing both the first phase III and also phase II. Notice that in (b) the
density of mobile vortices is higher on the ramp down
than on the ramp up. This is opposite of what is shown in (a).
C. Hysteresis for winding interstitial phase IX
The phase IX displays some remarkable hysteresis properties.
In Fig. 23 we examine the hysteresis of a system with the same pinning
parameters as in Fig. 19 with
rp=0.125
. In Fig. 23(a) the
driving force is brought up to fd=0.75f0,
driving the system into phase V, and then fd
is brought back to zero. The reverse curve follows the forward
curve down to
fd
0.625f0
or fd
fp, and then
drops down as the vortex flow enters phase IV. Note that region
IV is not seen on the initial ramp up, as expected from Fig. 19.
The appearance of phase IV on the ramp down occurs since the
flow in region V is very similar to the flow in phase IV:
the vortices move along the pinning rows and an effective
transverse barrier forms (see Sec. IV) that keeps the
vortices in the channels. It is interesting to note that
the transition from V to IV is quite broad and some small steps
appear in this transition region. We believe that the steps occur
as individual commensurate rows become pinned. As each row is pinned
Vx drops suddenly and then levels off until
another row is pinned. The 1D incommensurate-flow phase
IV persists down to about
fd
0.22fd
and then jumps to phase III. The flow
remains in region III almost down to the depinning force observed in
the initial ramp up curve. At this point, it jumps briefly
to phase II and finally reaches the region I pinned phase.
The width of the hysteresis curve is quite large, e.g., at
fd=0.5f0 the fraction of mobile vortices is
=0.27 on the ramp down and
=0.94 on the ramp up.
Notice that region IX does
not occur on the ramp down portion. If we ramp up the force again the
system will follow the same curve as the initial ramp up curve.
In Fig. 23(b) we show a hysteresis plot of the same system shown in Fig. 23(a) except that the maximum driving force fd=0.59f0 places the system in region III during the initial part of the ramp down. The reverse curve follows the forward curve down to about fd=0.4f0 where it enters phase IX at the same point that region IX ends on the ramp up. The ramp-down curve in phase IX has a slightly higher number of mobile vortices, causing this curve to lie above the ramp-up curve. The reverse curve is smoother and lacks the small jumps seen during the ramp up phase. During the ramp down, region IX persists below the driving force at which phases III and II appear on the ramp up, and then abruptly ends when the vortices repin at approximately the driving force needed for initial motion on the ramp up (i.e; the I-II ramp-up phase boundary phase). This strong hysteresis suggests that phase IX is a first order transition.
To understand the appearance of a distinct phase IX for small rp
we must consider that, prior to region IV, the sample is in the
random flow phase III. In this state, the vortices are being pinned
and depinned at random. A large portion of
configuration phase space can be explored and many different configurations
are possible. One possible configuration has most of the vortices
flowing in between the vortex rows while a small number of vortices
remain pinned at the pinning sites. The vortices at the pinning sites
cause a deflection of the vortices that are moving in between the
pinning rows. It can be seen that if the pinning radii are too large,
the deflected vortices will be trapped at the pinning sites.
If the pinning sites are small, vortices can pass the
pinned vortices without being trapped by a pin,
and continue to flow between the pinning rows.
We write a minimum criteria for this continuous flow by assuming that a
pinned vortex deflects a flowing vortex by a distance of
0.5
=a/4
[which is close to the deflection distance observed in Fig. 22(b)].
Since the center of each pinning site is located a distance a/2 from
the interstitially moving vortices at their point of close proximity,
it is expected that continuous winding interstitial motion (phase IX)
will occur for pinning sites of radius rp < a/4.
This can be seen in Fig. 22(b) where some winding paths almost collide
with the pins.
If the latter were slightly larger, the winding path would be blocked.
Contrary to this, the onset of continuous flow
did not occur until the pinning radius was reduced to
rp
0.175
.
To understand this, we note that in
Fig. 22 there are several places (third and eighth rows) where two
vortices are pinned in a row, causing additional deflection
in the y-direction and preventing continuous flow until smaller pins
are used.
r
from the ordered lattice position.
In terms of the lattice constant a, we will consider the maximum case,
r=a/2, to be a good approximation to a totally
random pinning array.

,
B/
=1.062, and
=0.25
/
,
for an initially square lattice
r/2a=0.
The disorder is created by displacing the square pinning array positions
random distances uniformly distributed from zero to
r. As the amount of disorder is increased,
the 2D disordered-flow phase III grows while the ordered-flow regions shrink:
phase IV disappears at
r/2a
0.08, and
region II disappears
around
r/2a
0.25.
For disorder larger than
r/2a
0.25,
only three (I, III, V) phases exist, which is in agreement with previous
studies on totally random arrays of pinning sites. Region
Vrandom is similar to region V with the vortices moving in
roughly 1D channels; however, the increasing randomness of the pinning
locations causes increasing wandering of vortices
in the transverse direction to occur.
The dashed line separating region III and region Vrandom
indicates the lack of a sharp boundary separating these two phases.

r/2a=0,
all the phases (I through V) are present.
For disorder
r/2a=0.075 and higher, as
in (a),(b),and (c), the discontinuity at the phase boundary II-III is lost.
In (a) and (b), for disorder
r/2a
0.125
region IV vanishes.
In Fig. 24 we present the phase
diagram for varying disorder, where maximum displacements up to
r=a/2=
are used,
and in Fig. 25 we present the V(I) curves
for the case with B/
=1.062,
fp=0.625f0,
=0.25
/
,
a=2
,
and rp=0.3
.
As the amount of disorder is gradually increased from zero,
the disordered flow region III grows while the ordered flow
phases II and IV shrink correspondingly.
Region II shrinks since the displacement of pinning sites into the
interstitial areas allows interstitial vortices to approach pinned
vortices more closely, resulting in a lower depinning transition.
The V(I) curves in Fig. 25 also emphasize the change in the
flow behavior. For disorder greater than
r/2a > 0.05 the
phase II to III transition is no longer discontinuous. The
size of the jump down in the voltage at the phase boundary
from III to IV transition also decreases. For large
enough disorder, as in Fig. 25(c),
only a small dip can be seen marking the III-V phase transition.
For disorder greater than
r/2a=0.125, as seen in Fig2. 25(a) and 25(b),
phase IV disappears and there is no longer a sharp boundary between regions
III and V, as indicated by the dotted line in Fig. 24. For
r/2a > 0.125
an increase in P6 near fd=fp indicates that a
transition from a less ordered to a more ordered vortex lattice still
occurs even in the presence of disordered pinning.
This has also been observed in
other simulations with random pinning.
5,6,26,27
We label this flow region Vr
to distinguish it from the 1D incommensurate channels seen in phase V.
From Fig. 24 is can be seen that
at
r
0.08a,
phase IV disappears. This can be understood when
we consider that in region IV, vortices flow in straight 1D paths
along the pinning rows. As the pinning sites are disordered,
it becomes increasingly difficult to create 1D straight paths that
follow the pinning sites. For the system in Fig. 24,
when
r=0.08a and
rp=0.3
,
the maximum transverse displacement of two pinning sites in a row is
0.16a if one pin is displaced a distance
y=+0.08a and the other
a distance
y=-0.08a.
When this occurs, we have
2
y
rp
[because here:
2
y=0.16a
rp=0.3
=0.3(a/2)=0.15a].
In this case, a vortex cannot travel
in a straight path along the longitudinal direction and still intersect
two consecutive pinning sites, so the
1D incommensurate motion of phase IV is lost. From Fig. 24 we find that
the disappearance of region IV occurs near a maximum transverse displacement
of
y=0.08a=0.16
,
giving
2
y
0.32
> rp=0.3
,
which is in agreement with the inequality
2
y
rp
that signals the disappearance of phase IV.
A. Formation of vortex channels in samples with a random distribution of pins
For
r > 0.15a
there are only three dynamical phases:
regions I, III, and V, with region II only occupying a
negligible part of the dynamic phase diagram.
These three regions are consistent with
results obtained theoretically and experimentally with random pinning arrays.
As the disorder increases, the nature of the flow in
disordered flow phase III changes due to the presence of randomness in the
location of the pins. In particular, the dynamics of the vortices
at the onset of region III is distinct from that of the higher drives.
We have found that in the regime of higher disorder
there are two different plastic flow phases: a single-channel
flow phase, and an intermittent channel flow phase
where some channels form, freeze,
and flow again.10,14,33

r=a/2.
The curve shows several jumps and plateaus in Vx
labeled (a), (b), (c), and (d). The plateaus (a) and (b)
correspond to the formation of single
channels of flowing vortices and (c) and (d) correspond to regions
where multiple channels are intermittently flowing
(Ref. 33).

We observe that, for large values of the disorder, the initial
depinning of vortices occurs by the formation of specific channels
that are stationary in time. In Fig. 26 we show a small section
of the voltage-current curve for the initial depinning of vortices
for the case of
r=1.0
on the
dynamic phase diagram. A running average over a period of time
was performed to remove small time scale fluctuations from the data.
Here it can be seen that in the initial part of the V(I) curve
there is a jump in Vx
at fd
0.2f0
and a plateau for
0.19f0
fd
0.206f0.
The value of Vx at
fd
0.207f0
rises again to a second plateau
at which point Vx again becomes roughly constant.
These two jumps in Vx correspond to the opening of
single 1D channels of mobile vortices. In Fig. 27(a) we
show the vortex trajectories
for the first plateau in the V(I) curve, labeled (a)
in Fig. 26. Here we can see that a single channel has appeared.
This channel consists of sixteen interstitial vortices
flowing around the vortices pinned at the pinning sites.
For Fig. 27(a), the driving force
in the x direction is fd=0.206f0,
and thus we estimate that if the
vortices were moving freely we would
have
Vx/Nv=16fd/Nv=16(.206)f0/344=0.0096f0.
The value from the V(I) curve
is Vx=0.0092f0. This actual value is lower as a
result of the slower vortex motion in the channels
caused by the existence of points along the channels where
vortices are temporarily immobile or are slowed down. The features of
the channel motion shown in Fig. 27(a) do not change with time.
To test whether this motion is truly c